<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/01/google-chrome-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/01/google-chrome-browser/</link>
	<description>Tech news &#124; Tech views &#124; Geeky goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:30:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Toms</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/01/google-chrome-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>George Toms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=555#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome is really fast!

Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):

http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome is really fast!</p>
<p>Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisha</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/01/google-chrome-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=555#comment-307</guid>
		<description>I think IE will still be around for quite a long time, it&#039;s built into Windows after all. And there are still many people who don&#039;t really know other browsers exist or how to get other browsers. Even I still prefer IE because it loads faster than all other browsers. I don&#039;t have time to wait for a browser to take 10 seconds to load.

If this Google browser looks good, has just as many (and good) features as Firefox does, I can see it replacing Firefox down the road, at least for Google fans. There are some that aren&#039;t a fan of Google (whether they used to be or never were).

As for Safari, I think Apple was a little late in the browser war as far as Windows goes anyway. So Safari may die off.

The real question is, will websites look fine in the browser? Will we have to start recoding our sites to look good in yet another browser?

I definitely will try out the browser as soon as it is available. I can&#039;t wait to see what Google has been up to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think IE will still be around for quite a long time, it&#8217;s built into Windows after all. And there are still many people who don&#8217;t really know other browsers exist or how to get other browsers. Even I still prefer IE because it loads faster than all other browsers. I don&#8217;t have time to wait for a browser to take 10 seconds to load.</p>
<p>If this Google browser looks good, has just as many (and good) features as Firefox does, I can see it replacing Firefox down the road, at least for Google fans. There are some that aren&#8217;t a fan of Google (whether they used to be or never were).</p>
<p>As for Safari, I think Apple was a little late in the browser war as far as Windows goes anyway. So Safari may die off.</p>
<p>The real question is, will websites look fine in the browser? Will we have to start recoding our sites to look good in yet another browser?</p>
<p>I definitely will try out the browser as soon as it is available. I can&#8217;t wait to see what Google has been up to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetechnewsblog1</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/01/google-chrome-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>thetechnewsblog1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=555#comment-308</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Well, it&#039;s official now - Google ARE enteriing the browser market and things are about to start getting REALLY interesting.&lt;/strong&gt;

I just spoke with Robert Scoble and he made a GREAT point; &quot;Will people still invest in Mozilla - now Google are in the browser wars?&quot;

His point is good, because without funding, Mozilla could really struggle.

I will be downloading the new google chrome beta tomorrow - should be interesting.....

... watch this space!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Well, it&#8217;s official now &#8211; Google ARE enteriing the browser market and things are about to start getting REALLY interesting.</strong></p>
<p>I just spoke with Robert Scoble and he made a GREAT point; &#8220;Will people still invest in Mozilla &#8211; now Google are in the browser wars?&#8221;</p>
<p>His point is good, because without funding, Mozilla could really struggle.</p>
<p>I will be downloading the new google chrome beta tomorrow &#8211; should be interesting&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8230; watch this space!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon..............</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/01/google-chrome-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon..............</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=555#comment-309</guid>
		<description>IE will definitely go, another browser pwning it up will make it hide its head in the sand. Maybe not the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE will definitely go, another browser pwning it up will make it hide its head in the sand. Maybe not the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

