<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Review &#8211; First impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>Tech news &#124; Tech views &#124; Geeky goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome Mac browser google &#124; The Tech News Blog</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-10828</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrome Mac browser google &#124; The Tech News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-10828</guid>
		<description>[...] Chrome browser.  Chrome has been available for PC&#8217;s since last year, indeed we did a Chrome review of the initial beta back on 2nd September [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chrome browser.  Chrome has been available for PC&#8217;s since last year, indeed we did a Chrome review of the initial beta back on 2nd September [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeaceByJesus</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>PeaceByJesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>Chrome is good for quick lookups (and it is fast), and provides much screen real estate, tabbed browsing, and does auto spell checking  and saves sessions automatically, and is a good replacement for IE (including 8). But for more serious intensive browsing it cannot beat FireFox with its many viable extensions. Chrome does not yet allow you to wrap the tabs into multiple lines, or save pages as .MHT (UnMht) or SaveWithURL, or undo closed tabs or change tab width, etc. (TabMixPlus) or color (ColorfulTabs), or save many different  sessions for later use (Session manager). Nor (to my knowledge) does it provide print preview or themes. But it is a welcome addition to my list of browsers, praise the Lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome is good for quick lookups (and it is fast), and provides much screen real estate, tabbed browsing, and does auto spell checking  and saves sessions automatically, and is a good replacement for IE (including 8). But for more serious intensive browsing it cannot beat FireFox with its many viable extensions. Chrome does not yet allow you to wrap the tabs into multiple lines, or save pages as .MHT (UnMht) or SaveWithURL, or undo closed tabs or change tab width, etc. (TabMixPlus) or color (ColorfulTabs), or save many different  sessions for later use (Session manager). Nor (to my knowledge) does it provide print preview or themes. But it is a welcome addition to my list of browsers, praise the Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome - Homepage and reload please!</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome - Homepage and reload please!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-502</guid>
		<description>[...] even managed to get my review of Google Chrome on page one of Google.com, with one of the first reviews of the chrome browser [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even managed to get my review of Google Chrome on page one of Google.com, with one of the first reviews of the chrome browser [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A DmIN</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>A DmIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-331</guid>
		<description>First of all, Google Chrome Beta (yes, it’s still in beta) which was released not long ago should not be compared with any browser because it has been released for a short while and this is there first browser and it’s just a Beta (not the completed version) unlike Firefox, and yet it still manages to challenge Firefox. Wait until Google releases 1-3 more updates/upgrades/newer versions to Google chrome and then try it again and most of you would like it (or since i’m now posting this, try the latest version of Google Chrome) but if you want add-ons/extensions that don’t slow down your browser or cause other issues like with Firefox, give Google 5 months - 1 year. Also, Google Chrome, believe it or not, is much faster, has a cleaner interface, uses less memory, crashes less than Firefox (with me) and is more secure and Google releases 10-30 nightly builds of Google Chrome everyday and also has a Developers/Testers channel which has newer versions of Google Chrome every 1-2 weeks (with a change log and new features etc) which are tested before they are publicly released. Google Chrome&#039;s EULA was changed the day it was released when an error was found in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Google Chrome Beta (yes, it’s still in beta) which was released not long ago should not be compared with any browser because it has been released for a short while and this is there first browser and it’s just a Beta (not the completed version) unlike Firefox, and yet it still manages to challenge Firefox. Wait until Google releases 1-3 more updates/upgrades/newer versions to Google chrome and then try it again and most of you would like it (or since i’m now posting this, try the latest version of Google Chrome) but if you want add-ons/extensions that don’t slow down your browser or cause other issues like with Firefox, give Google 5 months &#8211; 1 year. Also, Google Chrome, believe it or not, is much faster, has a cleaner interface, uses less memory, crashes less than Firefox (with me) and is more secure and Google releases 10-30 nightly builds of Google Chrome everyday and also has a Developers/Testers channel which has newer versions of Google Chrome every 1-2 weeks (with a change log and new features etc) which are tested before they are publicly released. Google Chrome&#8217;s EULA was changed the day it was released when an error was found in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News Blog Editor</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Blog Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

I&#039;m hearing a lot about Chrome&#039;s security being slack!
&lt;strong&gt;
Thanks for the heads up!&lt;/strong&gt;


JC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hearing a lot about Chrome&#8217;s security being slack!<br />
<strong><br />
Thanks for the heads up!</strong></p>
<p>JC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome - Homepage and reload please! &#171; The Tech News Blog</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome - Homepage and reload please! &#171; The Tech News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] read this week Google Chrome Review - First impressionsTwitter - why bother?How to write text upside down &amp; backwardsWindows MojaveThe Big Bang [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read this week Google Chrome Review &#8211; First impressionsTwitter &#8211; why bother?How to write text upside down &amp; backwardsWindows MojaveThe Big Bang [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Unfortunatly Chrome&#039;s Incognito mode isn&#039;t really private. It keeps so-called &quot;flash cookies&quot; even after leaving the Incognito mode. So every website can still keep track on you using this technique. And other users of your computer can see where you have been surfed too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunatly Chrome&#8217;s Incognito mode isn&#8217;t really private. It keeps so-called &#8220;flash cookies&#8221; even after leaving the Incognito mode. So every website can still keep track on you using this technique. And other users of your computer can see where you have been surfed too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetechnewsblog1</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>thetechnewsblog1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-330</guid>
		<description>@Gregor
Yeah, plugins will make a difference.

I&#039;m also looking forward to FF3.1 - the extra speed and the plugins might give FF3.1 a serious &lt;strong&gt;BOOOOOST!&lt;/strong&gt;


JC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gregor<br />
Yeah, plugins will make a difference.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also looking forward to FF3.1 &#8211; the extra speed and the plugins might give FF3.1 a serious <strong>BOOOOOST!</strong></p>
<p>JC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-329</guid>
		<description>I really like it.  Its fast, simple, easy to use, maximises the screen size and generally is a pleasure to use.

All it needs is some decent plug-ins and it&#039;ll be bye-bye Firefox!

Thanks for the review!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like it.  Its fast, simple, easy to use, maximises the screen size and generally is a pleasure to use.</p>
<p>All it needs is some decent plug-ins and it&#8217;ll be bye-bye Firefox!</p>
<p>Thanks for the review!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetechnewsblog1</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>thetechnewsblog1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-327</guid>
		<description>@Vaibhav
I agree 100% about the plugins. Chrome needs a few!

@TCCritic
Firstly, thanks for calling me a geek - that was nice!
You refer to my review as &#039;superflous analysis&#039; - yet it&#039;s been read by tens of thousands of people and was one of the first reviews of Chrome anywhere on the &#039;net.  How come you think tabbed browsing is new? Are you from the past?

You also say there&#039;s nothing new about Chrome - the SPEED is new!  It&#039;s far, far faster than IE8 or FF3.  That said, &#039;apparently&#039; Firefox 3.1 will be superfast when it launches at the end of the year.

&lt;strong&gt;Oh yeah - The fact that every tab in Chrome is unique, so that if it crashes you only lose that tab and not all your tabs and all your work - yep, that&#039;s new too and unavailable in either FF3 or IE8!&lt;/strong&gt;

I don&#039;t use Chrome as my default browser (I use FF3) - but for anything that requires speed, it has to be Chrome, for now.

JC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vaibhav<br />
I agree 100% about the plugins. Chrome needs a few!</p>
<p>@TCCritic<br />
Firstly, thanks for calling me a geek &#8211; that was nice!<br />
You refer to my review as &#8216;superflous analysis&#8217; &#8211; yet it&#8217;s been read by tens of thousands of people and was one of the first reviews of Chrome anywhere on the &#8216;net.  How come you think tabbed browsing is new? Are you from the past?</p>
<p>You also say there&#8217;s nothing new about Chrome &#8211; the SPEED is new!  It&#8217;s far, far faster than IE8 or FF3.  That said, &#8216;apparently&#8217; Firefox 3.1 will be superfast when it launches at the end of the year.</p>
<p><strong>Oh yeah &#8211; The fact that every tab in Chrome is unique, so that if it crashes you only lose that tab and not all your tabs and all your work &#8211; yep, that&#8217;s new too and unavailable in either FF3 or IE8!</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use Chrome as my default browser (I use FF3) &#8211; but for anything that requires speed, it has to be Chrome, for now.</p>
<p>JC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

