<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 upgrade from XP &#8211; NOT!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/</link>
	<description>Tech news &#124; Tech views &#124; Geeky goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FG</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-37398</link>
		<dc:creator>FG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-37398</guid>
		<description>I am LAUGHING so hard , OK lets start from the top ,  vista sucked nobody wanted it &quot;still dont&quot;  now we have windows 7 without a xp upgrade   this = no large xp base moving upto windows 7 anytime soon = no extra or new revenue for microsoft . I can only wait to hear the PR from microsoft 1 year from now when they are on tv wondering ??   what went wrong .. Like dumbasses without a vision they alienated all their xp user base from Window 7 ,(nice going you stupid people) This is exactly why microsoft has &quot;bad marketing&quot; &quot;Bad PR&quot; . I guess I have no choice to just upgrade everything to linux or mac  , Im so sick of waiting for microsoft to fart a decent idea out somewhere .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am LAUGHING so hard , OK lets start from the top ,  vista sucked nobody wanted it &#8220;still dont&#8221;  now we have windows 7 without a xp upgrade   this = no large xp base moving upto windows 7 anytime soon = no extra or new revenue for microsoft . I can only wait to hear the PR from microsoft 1 year from now when they are on tv wondering ??   what went wrong .. Like dumbasses without a vision they alienated all their xp user base from Window 7 ,(nice going you stupid people) This is exactly why microsoft has &#8220;bad marketing&#8221; &#8220;Bad PR&#8221; . I guess I have no choice to just upgrade everything to linux or mac  , Im so sick of waiting for microsoft to fart a decent idea out somewhere .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: André Tannús</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-13833</link>
		<dc:creator>André Tannús</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-13833</guid>
		<description>Well, I can see it quite clearly from where I stand at the moment:

1. Microsoft was started by a man with a vision and no team.
2. The man with the vision hired a bunch of programmers to continue to work of the guy who wrote DOS.
3. At a time where computers were expensive things for only very wealthy people (back when apple was educating itself about its public), this madman called bill gates was venturing into a world of having many clients who knew nothing about what they were acquiring.
4. Microsoft didn&#039;t have Microsoft as an example of poor management in this knew world, and being big and inneficient and inflexible, it grew in disorder, while a parallel world developed in the opposite direction: Slow, consistent growth.
5. Microsoft&#039;s team of old style businessman with both eyes on profit, and the poor habit of hiding it&#039;s problems by trying to cover them up with lies, dragged itself around, being occasionally beat up by the organized clan, like a bee trying to sting an elephant.
6. As Microsoft tested the market with poorly thought of solutions for problems it was creating along its journey, the organized clan was coming up with much better solutions, that were developed more slowly and carefully, but often inaccessible for the general public because, well, if you&#039;re a noob, your should RTFM.

Today, we see the result of a giant which was trying to tend to its client&#039;s problems by throwing a huge ammount of money in wrong directions, while a very well organized world developed alongside it.

For the future, we will see how the organized guys will try to look more and more pleasing to the customer (as Microsoft has failed at trying to be), while the giant tries to become structured well enough to compete with it&#039;s organized friend.

Both monsters are on a journey to a single place, of balance.

Microsoft will learn that it&#039;s operating system has to be free of charge (as it has been for the majority of its users), or it will perish.

The organized guys will learn that they must look at people who don&#039;t eat and breathe and sleep computers with a kinder eye (as they are successfully doing already, after some time of blind failure).

The line between them is ever growing thinner, and they will become one. One way, or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can see it quite clearly from where I stand at the moment:</p>
<p>1. Microsoft was started by a man with a vision and no team.<br />
2. The man with the vision hired a bunch of programmers to continue to work of the guy who wrote DOS.<br />
3. At a time where computers were expensive things for only very wealthy people (back when apple was educating itself about its public), this madman called bill gates was venturing into a world of having many clients who knew nothing about what they were acquiring.<br />
4. Microsoft didn&#8217;t have Microsoft as an example of poor management in this knew world, and being big and inneficient and inflexible, it grew in disorder, while a parallel world developed in the opposite direction: Slow, consistent growth.<br />
5. Microsoft&#8217;s team of old style businessman with both eyes on profit, and the poor habit of hiding it&#8217;s problems by trying to cover them up with lies, dragged itself around, being occasionally beat up by the organized clan, like a bee trying to sting an elephant.<br />
6. As Microsoft tested the market with poorly thought of solutions for problems it was creating along its journey, the organized clan was coming up with much better solutions, that were developed more slowly and carefully, but often inaccessible for the general public because, well, if you&#8217;re a noob, your should RTFM.</p>
<p>Today, we see the result of a giant which was trying to tend to its client&#8217;s problems by throwing a huge ammount of money in wrong directions, while a very well organized world developed alongside it.</p>
<p>For the future, we will see how the organized guys will try to look more and more pleasing to the customer (as Microsoft has failed at trying to be), while the giant tries to become structured well enough to compete with it&#8217;s organized friend.</p>
<p>Both monsters are on a journey to a single place, of balance.</p>
<p>Microsoft will learn that it&#8217;s operating system has to be free of charge (as it has been for the majority of its users), or it will perish.</p>
<p>The organized guys will learn that they must look at people who don&#8217;t eat and breathe and sleep computers with a kinder eye (as they are successfully doing already, after some time of blind failure).</p>
<p>The line between them is ever growing thinner, and they will become one. One way, or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich A</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-9742</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-9742</guid>
		<description>Unethical ? naaaaaaa hahahaha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unethical ? naaaaaaa hahahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpicture</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-4788</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpicture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-4788</guid>
		<description>Correction: Not the biggest company in the world.  Maybe the biggest unethical company in the world.  THE biggest company in the world has an annual profit equal to the MS gross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: Not the biggest company in the world.  Maybe the biggest unethical company in the world.  THE biggest company in the world has an annual profit equal to the MS gross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>Why move from XP x68 or XP x64, they are still MS&#039;s best OSs to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why move from XP x68 or XP x64, they are still MS&#8217;s best OSs to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meneame.net</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>meneame.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;La actualización de XP a Windows 7 no será tal. [ENG]...&lt;/strong&gt;

Microsoft proporcionará un paquete de actualización de software y licencia. Sin embargo será necesario hacer backup, instalar, restaurar datos y reinstalar programas. En español:www.theinquirer.es/2009/02/09/la-actualizacion-de-xp-a-w7-no-sera-tal....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>La actualización de XP a Windows 7 no será tal. [ENG]&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Microsoft proporcionará un paquete de actualización de software y licencia. Sin embargo será necesario hacer backup, instalar, restaurar datos y reinstalar programas. En español:www.theinquirer.es/2009/02/09/la-actualizacion-de-xp-a-w7-no-sera-tal&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La actualizacion de XP a W7 no será tal &#171; SeMaToVe</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>La actualizacion de XP a W7 no será tal &#171; SeMaToVe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>[...] TechNewsBlog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechNewsBlog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>Exactly it, Microsoft&#039;s way to get more cash from the XP users, I installed 7 and it seems very stable, I had no problems with it.

http://tech4000.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly it, Microsoft&#8217;s way to get more cash from the XP users, I installed 7 and it seems very stable, I had no problems with it.</p>
<p><a href="http://tech4000.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://tech4000.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La actualizacion de XP a W7 no será tal &#124; The Inquirer ES</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>La actualizacion de XP a W7 no será tal &#124; The Inquirer ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>[...] TechNewsBlog  //  SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;La actualizacion de XP a W7 no será tal&quot;, url: &quot;http://www.theinquirer.es/2009/02/09/la-actualizacion-de-xp-a-w7-no-sera-tal.html&quot; }); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechNewsBlog  //  SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;La actualizacion de XP a W7 no será tal&#8221;, url: &#8220;http://www.theinquirer.es/2009/02/09/la-actualizacion-de-xp-a-w7-no-sera-tal.html&#8221; }); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2009/02/06/windows-7-upgrade-from-xp-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.com/?p=1492#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Reinstall!!! This is big pain i think with so much data and programs installed already. This is clear MS guys do stupid things, lol it is expected from them in 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reinstall!!! This is big pain i think with so much data and programs installed already. This is clear MS guys do stupid things, lol it is expected from them in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

