<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Tech News Blog &#187; search engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/tag/search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com</link>
	<description>Tech news &#124; Tech views &#124; Geeky goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='thetechnewsblog.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Linking out for better SEO</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/04/linking-out-for-better-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/04/linking-out-for-better-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Connolly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inbound links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outbound links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outgoing links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a website and you want to improve your search engine optimization, there&#8217;s a chance you are not aware of the importance of linking OUT of your website! Linking out? Inbound links have long been established as a way to improve your search results.  However, as this interesting post by SEO Guru Gregor...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>If you have a website and you want to improve your search engine optimization, there&#8217;s a chance you are <strong>not</strong> <strong>aware </strong>of the importance of <a title="Search engine optimization seo" href="http://www.massmediadesign.co.uk/blog/archive/2008/08/08/trust-me---im-an-expert.aspx" target="_blank">linking OUT of your website!</a></p>
<h3>Linking out?</h3>
<p><strong>Inbound </strong>links have long been established as a way to improve your search results.  However, as this <a title="Search engine optimization seo" href="http://www.massmediadesign.co.uk/blog/archive/2008/08/08/trust-me---im-an-expert.aspx" target="_blank">interesting post by SEO Guru Gregor Spowart</a>, highlights &#8211; the power of <strong>linking OUT</strong> of your website or blog can be considerable too!  <a title="Search engine optimization seo" href="http://www.massmediadesign.co.uk/blog/archive/2008/08/08/trust-me---im-an-expert.aspx" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s the post &#8211; enjoy!</a></p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_jade" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fthetechnewsblog.com%252F2008%252F09%252F04%252Flinking-out-for-better-seo%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Linking%20out%20for%20better%20SEO%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/04/linking-out-for-better-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome Review &#8211; First impressions</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Blog Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firsfox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome download link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Chrome &#8211; Fast, effectint, intuitive &#38; a few beta issues too! As one of the first people to download today&#8217;s release of Google Chrome; Google&#8217;s new browser, I wanted to be one of the first to review it too.  So, having had an opportunity to thrash it for a few hours &#8211; here are my first...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h3>Google Chrome &#8211; Fast, effectint, intuitive &amp; a few beta issues too!</h3>
<p><a title="Google Chrome download link" href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-606" style="border:0 initial initial;" src="http://thetechnewsblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/google-chrome.jpg" alt="google chrome review" width="150" height="55" /></a></p>
<p>As one of the first people to download today&#8217;s release of <strong>Google Ch<span style="font-weight:normal;"><strong>rome</strong>; <strong>Google&#8217;s </strong>new browser, I wanted to be one of the first to review it too.  So, having had an opportunity to thrash it for a few hours &#8211; here are my first impressions! </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight:normal;">Before I start, you can <a title="Google Chrome" href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">grab yourself a copy of Google Chrome here!</a></span></strong><span style="color:#ffffff;">. </span></p>
<h3>Google Chrome &#8211; Speed</h3>
<p>The first thing you will notice about <strong>Google Chrome</strong> is the speed of it.  It is fast &#8211; I mean REALLY fast!<strong> Google Chrom</strong>e also loads from scratch in less than a second on my machine and I have never seen any browser download a web page faster.<span style="color:#ffffff;">.</span></p>
<h3>Google Chrome &#8211; Page display</h3>
<p>These are the very early stages of using <strong>Chrome</strong>, but thus far &#8211; every site I have visited looks pretty much the same as on FF3.  This is in stark contrast to the current beta of Internet Explorer 8; which even in &#8216;compatibility mode&#8217; renders some pages very poorly.<span style="color:#ffffff;">.</span></p>
<h3>Google Chrome &#8211; Ease of use</h3>
<p>Within seconds I was able to find my way around the <strong>Google Chrome browser</strong>.  It looks pretty basic, which I really like.  You will quickly notice that there&#8217;s no dedicated search bar. Instead, you use the address bar and it will automatically do a search using your favourite search engine (you get to choose!)</p>
<p>The settings section is very basic and easy to understand.  There are not that many options, compared with IE and Firefox.<span style="color:#ffffff;">. </span></p>
<h3>Google Chrome &#8211; Nifty tricks</h3>
<p>You are going to be hearing a LOT about the Google Chrome&#8217;s &#8216;<strong>Incognito mode</strong>&#8216;.  It allows you to surf websites without that website appearing in your browser&#8217;s history folder.  Also, any new cookies triggered from your <strong>incognito </strong><strong>mode </strong>tab will be deleted when you close it.  When you have a tab open in <strong>incognito mode</strong>, you get a little picture of a detective in the top left corner &#8211; so you can tell at a glance which mode you are in.</p>
<p>You can slide tabs around to arrange them in the right order &#8211; and they actually do slide.  It&#8217;s a nice effect!</p>
<p>Your bookmarks are automatically imported as soon as you install <strong>Google Chrome </strong>and your shortcuts will appear in the same order that they appeared in your previous browser &#8211; so everything&#8217;s where you expect it to be.</p>
<p>When you download a file, there&#8217;s a little animation of an arrow that plays &#8211; another nice little touch!<span style="color:#ffffff;">. </span></p>
<h3>Google Chrome issues</h3>
<p>As you would expect from a brand new beta, it&#8217;s not perfect!  Here are a few known problems from the <strong>Google Chrome</strong> help center and one of my own.  You can see the full list of known <a title="Google Chrome Problems" href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/request.py?contact_type=known_issues_2&amp;&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">issues here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>-  Google Calendar</strong> &#8211; If you create an all day event at the weekend it adds an extra day!<br />
<strong>-  Laptop</strong><strong>s </strong>sometimes won&#8217;t go to sleep <strong>with Google Chrome running!</strong><br />
<strong>-  Fixed Width fonts</strong> on some sites <strong>are tiny</strong> on Google Chrome!<br />
<strong>-  Fellow WordPress bloggers</strong> will find some of the posting tools behaving &#8216;odd.&#8217;<span style="color:#ffffff;">.</span></p>
<h3>Overall?</h3>
<p>As you can probably tell, I am really impressed.  <strong>Google Chrome</strong> is fast, easy to use and very polished for a beta release.  I will have to play with it for a few more days to get a REAL feel for it, but my initial impressions are very positive.</p>
<p>Knowing what <strong>Google </strong>are like, <strong>Chrome </strong>will probably stay in beta for ages.  It seems very solid and the feedback I have received from friends is that they are finding it equally stable.</p>
<p>The so-called browser wars have taken an interesting turn and I am not sure if this little baby is not going to be the winner.  How crazy is that?  After years of the &#8216;experts&#8217; telling us that it&#8217;s either Internet Explorer or Firefox who will win &#8211; there&#8217;s a new kid in town who &#8216;might&#8217; win the war (and far sooner than many imagined!)</p>
<p>I recommend you <a title="Download Google Chrome" href="http://www.google.com/chrome/" target="_blank">download yourself a copy</a> and give it a go!<span style="color:#ffffff;">.</span></p>
<h3>That&#8217;s my first impression of Google Chrome - What do YOU think?</h3>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_jade" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fthetechnewsblog.com%252F2008%252F09%252F02%252Fgoogle-chrome-review-first-impressions%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Google%20Chrome%20Review%20-%20First%20impressions%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-review-first-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuil is not so cool</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/08/08/cuil-is-not-so-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/08/08/cuil-is-not-so-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Blog Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you have not heard, there&#8217;s (yet) another &#8216;Google-beater&#8216; search engine on the block.  What am I referring to?  www.cuil.com of course! How cool is Cuil? I REALLY wanted to like Cuil (pronounced cool).  I wanted there to be a serious contender to the Google search engine crown, because the marketplace ALWAYS does better...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In case you have not heard, there&#8217;s (yet) another &#8216;<strong>Google-beater</strong>&#8216; <strong>search engine</strong> on the block.  What am I referring to?  <a title="Cuil.com" href="http://www.cuil.com" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong></strong></span></a><strong><a title="Cuil" href="http://www.cuil.com" target="_blank">www.cuil.com</a></strong> of course!</p>
<h3>How cool is Cuil?</h3>
<p>I REALLY wanted to like <strong>Cuil </strong>(pronounced <strong><span style="color:#888888;"><em>cool</em></span></strong>).  I wanted there to be a serious contender to the <strong>Google</strong> <strong>search engine </strong>crown, because the marketplace ALWAYS does better when there&#8217;s some competition and at present &#8211; <strong>Google</strong> has a <em>NEAR </em><strong>monopoly</strong>.</p>
<h3>Giving Cuil some time to settle</h3>
<p>Early reviews of <strong>Cuil </strong>were full of complaints regarding the fact it was either slow or off-line.  In fairness, what did these reviewers expect from the first day of a new search engine?  The amount of pre-launch publicity <strong>Cuil </strong>attracted, meant it was highly likely that it would not be able to cope with the massive spike in <strong>traffic </strong>on day one.</p>
<p>So, I decided to give <strong>Cuil </strong>a while to settle before I put it through it&#8217;s paces.  On the plus side, the service was working and very fast too.  On the down-side, the results it returned were (in my opinion) <strong>extremely</strong> <strong>poor</strong>.  I would like to think that it will improve in time; after all, these are the very early days.  I shall check it again in a month and see if <strong>Cuil </strong>is any closer to providing me with a serious alternative to <strong>Google</strong>.</p>
<h3>What have YOUR experiences of <strong>Cuil </strong>been?  Let me know!</h3>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_jade" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fthetechnewsblog.com%252F2008%252F08%252F08%252Fcuil-is-not-so-cool%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Cuil%20is%20not%20so%20cool%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/08/08/cuil-is-not-so-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did Yahoo pick Google over Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/06/14/why-did-yahoo-pick-google-over-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/06/14/why-did-yahoo-pick-google-over-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Blog Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Yahoo are now officially partners. The question now is; "why did Yahoo reject Microsoft, yet accept a partnership with their arch rival Google?" Read on and find out what Microsoft offered Yahoo - you might be surprised!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://thetechnewsblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/www-keyboard.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-59" style="float:left;margin-left:4px;margin-right:4px;" src="http://thetechnewsblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/www-keyboard.jpg?w=300" alt="yahoo and google" width="150" height="112" /></a>So, <a title="Google and Yahoo become partners" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/06/13/yahoo-to-use-google-adsense/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>Google and </strong><strong>Yahoo are now officially &#8220;an item!&#8221; </strong></span></a>The question now is; &#8220;why did Yahoo reject <strong>Microsoft</strong>, yet accept a partnership with their arch rival <strong>Google</strong>?&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Microsoft&#8217;s offer</strong><br />
We now know what <strong>Yahoo </strong>were offered from <strong>Microsoft</strong>!  In a letter to Microsoft employees yesterday, Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft’s platforms and services division, outlined what <strong>Yahoo </strong>were offered.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a direct quote (including some odd punctuation);<br />
<em>&#8220;<strong>1. </strong>Microsoft would have invested $8 billion in Yahoo! at $35/share;<br />
<strong>2. </strong>Microsoft would have purchased Yahoo!’s search assets for $1 billion, and assumed the operations and R&amp;D expense while returning data back to Yahoo! for use in their advertising business; and<br />
<strong>3.</strong> Microsoft and Yahoo! would have entered into a long-term search partnership, where Microsoft would have provided favorable economics to Yahoo! search, including a three-year guarantee of higher monetization than Yahoo!’s Panama paid search system currently provides.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>This offer sounds more attractive than the <strong>Google </strong>deal; <strong>Microsoft</strong>&#8216;s offer would also have added approximately a quarter of a billion dollars MORE to Yahoo&#8217;s operating profits.  As <a title="Bill Gates quote" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/28/bill-gates-we-will-build-the-worlds-best-search/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>I blogged previously</strong></span></a>, Bill Gates is now going to remain a part of Microsoft&#8217;s attempt to <a title="Bill Gates to build worlds best search engine" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/28/bill-gates-we-will-build-the-worlds-best-search/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>&#8216;build the world&#8217;s best search!&#8217;</strong></span></a></p>
<p><strong>A Google Internet?</strong><br />
I saw a quote this morning that asked; &#8220;Are we being led blindly toward a <strong>Google-Internet</strong>?&#8221; This got me thinking, because I have definitely noticed that <strong>Google </strong>are now finally starting to get some negative publicity.</p>
<p>After years of being regarded as &#8216;the peoples friend&#8217; it seems many are now suspicious of <a title="Googles search dominance" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/20/go-and-kiss-googles-ass/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>Google&#8217;s growing online dominance.</strong></span></a></p>
<p>The Internet is driven and directed by search and <strong>Google </strong>now &#8216;all-but own&#8217; the search market.  I think it&#8217;s easy to see why questions are being asked about the power <strong>Google </strong>now has &#8211; and perhaps more worryingly <strong>- the power Google are about to have!</strong></p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_jade" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fthetechnewsblog.com%252F2008%252F06%252F14%252Fwhy-did-yahoo-pick-google-over-microsoft%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Why%20did%20Yahoo%20pick%20Google%20over%20Microsoft%3F%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/06/14/why-did-yahoo-pick-google-over-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Live Search cash back must fail!</title>
		<link>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/24/microsoft-live-search-cash-back-must-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/24/microsoft-live-search-cash-back-must-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 06:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tech News Blog Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft live search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetechnewsblog.wordpress.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft announced this week that it will offer cash back to consumers, who search on Microsoft Live and make a purchase. This was treated as news; even though Bill Gates had already told us he was doing it way back in December 2005!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Microsoft </strong>announced this week that it will offer cash back to consumers, who search on <strong>Microsoft Live</strong> and make a purchase.  This was treated as news; even though Bill Gates had already told us he was doing it way back in December <strong>2005</strong>!</p>
<p>It seems the focus at <a title="microsoft" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/21/eggs-and-kisses-ballmer-and-google/" target="_blank"><strong>Microsoft </strong></a>as far back as 2005, was not to develop a better search product than <strong>Google </strong>- but to pay people to use an awful one.   An interesting business model for the world&#8217;s richest technology company.  With that approach to search engine innovation, it&#8217;s really is no surprise that <strong><a title="google" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/20/go-and-kiss-googles-ass/" target="_blank">Google</a> </strong>still rules the search space!</p>
<p>The reason Google is ‘killing&#8217; <strong>Microsoft Live Search</strong> in the marketplace, is because of the inferior quality of the <strong>Microsoft</strong> search results.  Many great sites and pages are not even indexed by <strong>Microsoft Live Search</strong> and of those which are, many have stacks of pages missing &#8211; it&#8217;s a total mess!</p>
<p>I think the only way this can work for <strong>Microsoft</strong>, is if people use <a title="google" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/20/go-and-kiss-googles-ass/" target="_blank"><strong>Google </strong></a>to find what they want to buy, and then try to locate that same deal via <strong>Microsoft Live Search</strong>, so they get their cash back!</p>
<p>Microsoft, why not just focus on making your own search results more accurate and relevant?  You have the money, go and hire the people who can fix your search engine, then make your product better than <strong>Google</strong>&#8216;s.</p>
<p>It is any wonder that <a title="Microsoft google" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/21/eggs-and-kisses-ballmer-and-google/" target="_blank"><strong>Microsoft and Google</strong></a> are looked at so differently by the public?  This week, Microsoft&#8217;s S<a title="steve ballmer" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/21/eggs-and-kisses-ballmer-and-google/" target="_blank"><strong>teve Ballmer was being pelted with eggs</strong></a>, while the media gathered in the UK to <a title="google" href="http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/21/eggs-and-kisses-ballmer-and-google/" target="_blank"><strong>kiss Google&#8217;s ass!</strong></a></p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_jade" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fthetechnewsblog.com%252F2008%252F05%252F24%252Fmicrosoft-live-search-cash-back-must-fail%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Microsoft%20Live%20Search%20cash%20back%20must%20fail%21%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thetechnewsblog.com/2008/05/24/microsoft-live-search-cash-back-must-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

